Client-Identified Impacts of Helpful and Hindering Events in Psychotherapy : A Qualitative Meta-analysis

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Medicine. It includes Faculty of Social Studies. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

LADMANOVÁ Michaela ŘIHÁČEK Tomáš TIMULAK Ladislav

Year of publication 2022
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Psychotherapy Research
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Social Studies

Citation
Web https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2021.2003885
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.2003885
Keywords significant events; helpful events; hindering events; qualitative meta-analysis
Attached files
Description Objective: Understanding the client perspective is important for the provision of psychotherapy. The significant events paradigm, within which clients report on the most significant events of a therapy session immediately after the session,represents a useful means to explore clients' in-session experience. Method: The aim of this study was to investigate what types of client-identified impacts are reported in qualitative studies on helpful and hindering events in psychotherapy. Seventeen primary studies focusing on client-identified helpful and hindering events were identified through database searches and subsequent manual searches. The data were subjected to qualitative meta-analysis. Results: The descriptions of event impacts were classified into 12 helpful (e.g., gaining a new perspective on the self; feeling heard, understood, and accepted; and feeling engaged in the therapeutic process) and eight hindering (e.g., lacking guidance from the therapist and feeling emotionally overwhelmed) impact meta-categories. Conclusion: The findings provide an update to a previous meta-analysis by identifying several new categories of helpful event impacts and by categorizing hindering event impacts.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info