Teclistamab in Multiple Myeloma with One to Three Previous Lines of Therapy

Authors

TOUZEAU Cyrille MINA Roberto QUACH Hang HUNGRIA Vania BHUTANI Divaya CHEN Wenming KUMAR Swarup CHAULAGAIN Chakra DIMOPOULOS Meletios Athanasios BAHLIS Nizar J MARAL Senem VAN DE DONK NIELS W C J JAYR Schmidt Filho SAJA Khalid TEIPEL Raphael ANDO Miki ROELOFFZEN Wilfried ANNIBALI Ombretta AUGUSTSON Bradley BOTTA Cirino DELFORGE Michel BOURGEOIS Emmanuelle BUDA Gabriele HUS Marek PERROT Aurore PREIS Meir BEKSAC Meral POUR Luděk FARMER Sarah NUNES Marta ORIOL Albert MELCHARDT Thomas HU Yu FLOGEGARD Max WANG Dai PEI Lixia WROBLEWSKI Susan ARIES Ingrid M QUIJANO CARDE Natalia A PEROVA Tatiana TERTIA de Jager YEH Tzu-Min VANQUICKELBERGHE Veronique SHAH Priya CHASTAIN Katherine KOBOS Rachel CARSON Robin LANDGREN Ola

Year of publication 2026
Type Peer-reviewed scientific article
Magazine / Source New England journal of medicine
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
web https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2603870
Doi https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2603870
Description Background The efficacy of teclistamab, a bispecific antibody targeting B-cell maturation antigen and CD3, as early-line monotherapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is unclear. Methods We randomly assigned patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had previously received one, two, or three lines of therapy, including an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and lenalidomide, to receive teclistamab or the investigator's choice of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) or carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd). Antimicrobial prophylaxis and immune globulin replacement were recommended. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent review committee. Results A total of 296 patients were assigned to teclistamab and 297 to PVd or Kd. At the interim analysis (median follow-up, 17.3 months), teclistamab significantly improved progression-free survival as compared with PVd or Kd (estimated 18-month progression-free survival, 69.8% vs. 26.9%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.38; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher with teclistamab than with PVd or Kd (65.9% vs. 16.8%, P<0.001). Overall survival was improved with teclistamab as compared with PVd or Kd (estimated 18-month overall survival, 79.2% vs. 68.6%; hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.83; P=0.002). Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 84.9% of teclistamab recipients and in 76.3% of PVd or Kd recipients, with grade 5 adverse events in 6.5% and 3.5%, respectively. Cytokine release syndrome, mostly of grade 1 or 2, occurred in 66.0% of teclistamab recipients, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 4.1%. Grade 3 or 4 infection occurred in 41.6% of teclistamab recipients and in 29.0% of PVd or Kd recipients. Conclusions Among patients with multiple myeloma and one to three previous lines of therapy, teclistamab significantly improved progression-free and overall survival as compared with PVd or Kd. Infections of grade 3 or 4 were common. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; MajesTEC-9 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05572515.)

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info